All articles
comparisongovernance2026-02-0912 min read

AI Agent Governance Tools Compared (2026): TameFlare vs Zenity vs Knolli vs OPA

A detailed comparison of the leading AI agent governance tools. Self-hosted vs SaaS, proxy vs SDK, and what matters for your team.

The landscape

The AI agent governance market is projected to grow from ~$300M (2025) to $4.8B by 2034. As agents become more autonomous, the need for policy enforcement, audit trails, and human-in-the-loop controls is critical.

Here's how the leading tools compare.

TameFlare

Type: Self-hosted proxy gateway License: Elastic License v2 (source-available) Approach: Transparent HTTP/HTTPS proxy that intercepts all agent API calls
StrengthDetail
Zero code changesWrap any agent with tf run
Credential isolationAgents never see real API keys
Self-hostedYour data stays on your infrastructure
Framework-agnosticWorks with LangChain, CrewAI, n8n, Claude Code, any agent
Best for: Teams that want full control, self-hosted deployment, and framework-agnostic governance.

Zenity

Type: Enterprise SaaS platform Approach: Unified observability and governance across all agent platforms
StrengthDetail
Multi-platformCovers Copilot, Cursor, Claude, custom agents
Enterprise featuresSSO, RBAC, compliance reporting
Runtime governanceMonitors agent reasoning and tool use
Trade-off: SaaS-only. Your agent data flows through Zenity's infrastructure. No self-hosted option. Best for: Large enterprises with multiple agent platforms and compliance requirements.

Knolli

Type: Managed copilot fleet platform Approach: Platform lock-in with built-in crypto enforcement
StrengthDetail
Crypto enforcementSimilar to TameFlare's ES256 tokens
HITL approvalsBuilt-in human-in-the-loop
Audit trailImmutable action log
Trade-off: Requires using Knolli's agent platform. Not bring-your-own-agent. Best for: Teams starting fresh who want an all-in-one agent + governance platform.

OPA (Open Policy Agent)

Type: General-purpose policy engine Approach: Rego-based policy language for any authorization decision
StrengthDetail
Mature ecosystemWidely adopted in cloud-native
FlexibleCan express any policy logic
Open sourceApache 2.0 license
Trade-off: Not agent-specific. No built-in connectors, audit trail, or approval workflow. You build the integration yourself. Best for: Teams with existing OPA infrastructure who want to extend it to agent governance.

Summary

FeatureTameFlareZenityKnolliOPA
Self-hostedYesNoNoYes
Zero code changesYesVariesNoNo
Credential isolationYesNoYesNo
HITL approvalsYesYesYesNo
Audit trailYesYesYesNo
Framework-agnosticYesYesNoYes
Free tierYesNoYesYes

Our recommendation

If you want full control and self-hosted deployment: TameFlare. If you need enterprise SaaS with multi-platform coverage: Zenity. If you want an all-in-one platform: Knolli. If you already use OPA and want to extend it: OPA + custom integration.

AI Agent Governance Tools Compared (2026): TameFlare vs Zenity vs Knolli vs OPA | TameFlare